TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
The Grail legend started as a Celtic myth
in the Middle Ages when stories about the feats of king Arthur were
circulating among the populace. It was part of their oral tradition.
The first documented work on this, Historia regum Brittaniae
was written by Geoffrey of Monmouth between A.D. 1135 and 1139. In this
work, Geoffrey related the story of how the great king defeated the
Romans in eastern France. The association of the Grail with king Arthur
started with Chrétien de Troyes who wrote the earliest extant work on
the Grail. He claimed to have had as his source for the story one Count
Philip of Flanders. This work, Conte del Graal, written at about 1190A.D.
was however left unfinished but was continued by four different Authors
who gave different endings to it and only in the third of the continuations
written by Manessier around 1230A.D. did Parsifal achieve the Grail.
After Chrétien came Wolfram von Eschenbach's Parzival written between
A.D. 1200 and 1210 and was one of the most celebrated romances of the
time and has been considered by some to be of profound mystical significance.
The source of Eschenbach's work is not
known but he may or may not have borrowed from Chrétien. Their hero,
called Perceval by Chrétien and Parzival by Wolfram had the same qualities
of innocence and guilelessness. Only their views about the nature of
the Grail differed with Wolfram calling it a stone which falls from
heaven and Chrétien declaring that it was a large bowl or chalice. In
the 13th century came the Welsh romance Peredur which obviously had
a similar origin with the work of Chrétien as the body of the work and
the hero are the same. In fact it could be said that Chrétien's work
was derived form the Celtic oral tradition which already may have had
this character in it. Before Chrétien, the Grail was not considered
to be a Christian symbol and he did not make much of an attempt to explain
the Grail and the lance in a significantly Christian way. That was left
to another medieval writer Robert de Boron whose work, Joseph d'Arimathie
was written at about 1200A.D. De Boron was actually the first through
this work to provide a coherent explanation of what the Grail and the
lance were and their significance. He drew heavily from the apocryphal
works Acts of Pilate and Gospel of Nicodemus(4th and 5th centuries).
De Boron claimed that his work was inspired
and had been revealed to him by an Angel. He therefore initiated a chain
of events which led to a total adoption of the Grail and the lance by
the Christian faith. His conclusions that the Grail was the cup which
had been used by Jesus and His disciples for the Last Supper and in
which His Blood was caught while He was being prepared for burial was
apparently carried to its logical conclusion when the Queste del Saint
Graal was completed in 1210A.D. With the appearance of this body of
work written probably by French monks, the Grail came to be fully interpreted
in the light of Christian tradition. It fully became the cup of the
Last Supper and the Spear became the lance that the Roman soldier, Longinus
had used in piercing the side of Jesus. According to de Boron, Joseph
of Arimathea had requested the body of Jesus from the Roman authorities
so that he could bury it. While he was bathing this body, some blood
trickled out from the wound, which Jesus sustained on the cross through
the spear of the Roman soldier. He collected the blood in the cup which
had previously been used by Jesus and His disciples during the Last
Supper. When Jesus' body disappeared however, Joseph was accused of
stealing it, arrested by the Jewish authorities and jailed. While in
jail, though he was deprived of food, he miraculously survived as a
result of a wafer being dropped daily by a dove into the cup which he
had with him. While in prison, Jesus appeared to him in a vision and
entrusted the holy spear and the cup to him for safekeeping. Joseph
thereafter journeyed westwards and established a church in Glastonbury,
England dedicated to the Virgin Mary.
The Grail Order was born and a succession
of guardians followed until we reach the Arthurian age when the Grail
became associated with him. There have also been a succession of tables
where the guardians sit to celebrate the holy Mass. The first Table
was established by Joseph and his followers and only twelve may sit
at this table representing the twelve disciples of Christ. The thirteenth
seat was not occupied and it became known as Siege Perilous after one
of them was swallowed up as he tried to sit on it. This seat represented
that of Judas. In some versions of the story, Joseph did not reach Britain,
but made his stop somewhere in Europe and was succeeded by his sister's
husband Bron who established the second Table on the Mountain of Salvation
which was identified to be in France and this man Bron in this version
became the Fisher king and highest guardian of the Grail. The third
Table called the Round Table was formed for king Arthur by Merlin, the
magician but the Grail however was absent. It was said to have made
a brief appearance at the Round Table at Pentecost and the sight was
so magnificent that most of Arthur's knights pledge their lives to the
pursuit of this mysterious object. The guardianship of the Grail required
the highest degree of chastity and according to tradition, only the
purest of men could be the guardians.
In return for their purity, the
Grail conferred blessings upon the land and was visible to all. The
Grail withdrew its presence from humanity however, when its highest
guardian in one version looked lustfully at a maiden who had come to
worship, the lance fell on him spontaneously inflicting a deep wound
that would not heal and from then on he was referred to as the maimed
or wounded king. Therefore, by the time of king Arthur, the Grail had
withdrawn its presence and was no longer to be seen, hence the quest
for it when it made its brief appearance. Merlin, the magician and prophet
had sent a message to king Arthur telling him that the time was ripe
to set about the quest for the Grail and the knight who would achieve
this quest was already born and of the right age. With king Arthur and
his knights, the stage was set for what was to be one of the most important
if not the most important medieval quest. The very last of the medieval
writers to concern himself with the Grail was Sir Thomas Mallory who
transmitted the legend to English-speaking peoples. His work Morte d'Arthur
was more of a chronicle of the history and achievements of king Arthur
than it is a romance about the Grail.
top
There are at least six versions of the
Grail legend, the earliest as mentioned above being that of Chrétien
(c1190). The work of Wolfram followed (c1200-1210). The two works did
not make much of an attempt to adopt the relics as Christian. That started
with the work of de Boron and this association came to be completed
with the work Queste del Graal (c1210). Peredur, a 13th century Welsh
romance is of unknown origin and the body of the story is very similar
to what we find in the earlier works of Wolfram and Chrétien. Mallory
(15th century) did not pay too much attention to the mystical significance
of the Grail and as such the legend was not explored further through
him. We had to wait until the 19th century in Wagner's Parsifal (1882)
to see the greatest advancement in the story of the Grail for close
to five hundred years. Taking the theme further, Wagner gave it a body
and a significance that was at once beautiful and religious. His opera
was so profound that he declared it sacred and forbade its performance
outside his theatre in Bayreuth.
The Grail legend goes as follows: Parsifal
was brought up by his mother in the seclusion of the wilderness after
his father had died in a battle with his elder brothers. His mother,
grief stricken sought to protect her only remaining son from the world
of chivalry by withholding from him all knowledge of arms and of the
outside world. He was only allowed to play with sticks, bows and arrows
in the use of which he became very proficient. One day, he happened
to see some knights in full armour in the distance and asked his mother
who these people were. The mother told him that they were angels. Parsifal
then said that if these people were angels he would go and become an
angel like them. He went over to them exchanged a few words with them
and was able to learn that these people were not angels but knights.
He intimated this knowledge to his mother who fainted as a result. He
left her in that state and went to make a saddle for one of his mother's
horses imitating what he had seen with the knights. When he returned,
his mother had recovered sufficiently to ask him of his decision. He
declared that he would go if she allowed him and the mother gave him
leave. He left home and the accounts of his numerous adventures followed.
He was trained to be a knight by a hermit called Gournemart. One day
while he was returning home to see his mother, he happened to be riding
along the bank of a river when he saw two fishermen and he asked them
where he could find a passage across the river.
Since the passage was a long way off and
he could not by any chance reach it by daylight, he asked for where
he could get shelter. He was then directed by one of the fishermen to
the top of a mountain where he would find a castle. He found the castle,
was welcomed, fed and entertained. While he was dining with the master
of the house however, a procession of youths passed several times with
what appeared to be the Grail, a large cup which outshone all the lights
in the room. A spear was also paraded which appeared to be dripping
with blood from its tip. Though his curiosity was aroused by the spectacle
and he wanted to ask about what he had seen, he however held his tongue,
always calling to mind what he had been taught by the old knight, Gornemant,
who had warned him against loquaciousness. This king, called the fisher
king because he regularly fishes, is infirm having been wounded some
say in a javelin battle in the thighs or as in some versions as a result
of his sins when he looked with lustful eye upon the female worshipper,
with the lance spontaneously falling upon him as mentioned above. In
any case, this king is maimed and is not able to carry out his functions
fully as keeper of the Grail as he is in continuous pain. His cure according
to the legend was for Parsifal to ask the magic question about the Grail
which is "Whom does one serve with the Grail?" He fails to do this however,
and the country as a consequence becomes a barren land or a waste land
as is so called in the legend.
Parsifal leaves the castle without asking
these questions and came to meet a lady who happens to also be his first
cousin. She told him of the terrible deed he had committed for failing
to ask these questions and that the reason he failed was the sin he
committed against his mother who had died grieving for him after he
left her. That sin had been responsible for his failure. Parsifal hearing
this broke down in woes of sorrow and did not return home again since
his mother whom he was going to see had died. He left the lady and embarked
on more adventures and entered Arthur's court as a celebrated knight.
While there a loathsome lady made her entrance and addressed Parsifal,
bemoaned of his failure to ask the question and warned of the consequences
of his deed which would lead to the land being rendered wasted as mentioned
above. Thereafter, he made a vow that he would not rest until he had
found the Grail and learnt whom one served with it. He lost his way
for five years and eventually on a Good Friday met a priest, made his
confession because he had forgotten God for all these years and was
absolved of his sins. Chrétien left his work unfinished.
We move on to the work of Wolfram. He
believed that the Grail was a stone fallen from heaven which is a sharp
contrast to the popular belief that it was a chalice. He however, gave
the fisher king a name and called him Anfortas. The Grail resided in
a magnificent castle and whatever was asked of it was given. Men ate,
drank their fills and all these bounties were provided by the Grail.
This stone had been brought down by neutral angels during the war between
God and Lucifer and since then only the pure ones have been chosen to
guard the Grail. This of course is in contrast to Chrétien's cup and
there was no attempt to associate it with Jesus. The bleeding lance
was also present and Parsifal in this account also failed to ask the
magical question. His failure to ask the question however, was not attributed
to his sin against his mother but to something else. Anfortas had been
wounded in a battle between the thighs. He had been engaged in this
battle because of the love he had for a woman. He had remained in agony
since then and despite all the remedies in the whole world he remained
in pain.
Confounded, his knights prayed that help
should come to them and as if by some miracle, a writing appeared on
the Grail stone, that a knight would come whom by asking the right questions
would heal the king. Chrétien's Gornemant became Wolfram's Gurnemanz,
the knight who trained Parsifal in the art of arms, and the loathsome
lady of Chrétien became Kundrie. Parsifal however, achieved the Grail
eventually and became the king by returning to the castle to ask the
right questions. There are significant differences between the two works
and some of these would include the differences in their perceptions
as to the origin and the nature of the Grail and Parsifal's achieving
the quest, which did not happen in Chrétien's work probably because
this work remained unfinished. Parsifal however, achieved the Grail
in one of the "continuations" of Chrétien's work by the author Manessier
completed in 1230A.D.
As time went on other characters came
to be added to the legends and the stories became more and more complicated
and in some versions, attention shifted completely away from Parsifal
to another knight named Galahad who was the son of Lancelot of the lake,
a product of the union between Lancelot and king Arthur's daughter.
The legends grew this way until interest in them waned towards the dawn
of the renaissance with the last true work on Arthur and his round table
being that of Sir Thomas Mallory in the 15th century.
After a very long lull in interest in
the legends came the work of Richard Wagner. Parsifal, finished in 1882
was a complete shift of emphasis from the Arthurian court to that of
the Grail knighthood. The knights in Wagner's opera were not those of
Arthur but of the Grail. The guardians of the Grail had become knights
and the focus of the whole play was on these. It was the struggle between
good and evil that was dramatised with good ultimately triumphing. He
drew heavily on Wolfram's work but refused to accept the idea of the
Grail as being a stone. Instead he stuck with de Boron's conclusions
about the sacred association of these relics with Christ.
The Grail land itself thereby became the
focus and centre of attraction of the whole play. Amfortas, the young
knight had been appointed by his father Titurel to succeed him since
he was getting old and was not able to perform his duties fully as first
guardian of the Grail. Amfortas performed this duty until he succumbed
to the evil machinations of the wicked one, Klingsor who had been denied
membership in the Grail Order. The brotherhood came to be in possession
of the relics (the holy spear and the Grail) through the appearance
of the Saviour, Jesus to one of the founding fathers of the order. Jesus
had entrusted the relics to them for safekeeping and had adjured them
to be pure. Since then they had been the guardians of the Grail and
the holy spear.
Things however were not looking so good
for the brotherhood for they had lost many knights to the temptations
of Klingsor who had built a beautiful garden of maidens who laid in
waiting to seduce the weary travellers. Denied admittance in to the
brotherhood, Klingsor had become versed in all sorts of magic, which
he now used against the brotherhood in his hatred for them and in his
desire to seize the chalice. The latter, called the Holy Grail was to
the knights, the cup, which Jesus had used during the Last Supper with
His disciplines and in which His Blood had been caught. The Grail also
was to them a kind of manna from heaven. It provided heavenly food,
which was sustenance for them and as long as they ate of the wafer,
which the Grail provided, they would not grow old.
For the blessings of the Grail to flow
however, it had to be uncovered and this task was given to Amfortas.
Amfortas, tired of the continual loss of his knights to Klingsor set
forth with the holy spear in his hand to challenge him in battle. Klingsor
however, laid in waiting and had already planned his destruction. He
summoned his servant, Kundry who was partly good and partly evil to
seduce him. Amfortas, with his defences weakened by her embraces let
go of the holy spear. Klingsor appears snatches the spear, inflicted
a deep wound with the spear on Amfortas and made his escape. Amfortas
in agony was rescued and taken home and has lived with the pain ever
since.
All treatments were to no avail and his
sufferings grew worse by the day as the wound would not heal. He was
meanwhile condemned to serve the Grail and as long as he looked on it
he could not die, thereby prolonging his anguish. He prayed for death,
to be released from service, as the pains were unbearable, made worse
each day that he had to uncover the Grail. Amfortas had been shown a
vision while praying in anguish that he should wait for one who would
cure him. One who through pity, knowing, would be his healer, the pure
fool, (in German der reine Tor). The Knight Gurnemanz was busy recounting
the story of how the brotherhood came to lose the spear when suddenly
shouts of confusion were heard. A swan had been killed on holy land
and a youth had been arrested. Brought before Gurnemanz, he was reproached
but could not tell why he had shot the swan nor could he give his name.
He appeared to have completely lost his memory.
At this point Gurnemanz began to hope
that this might be the pure fool that was promised. Kundry however,
happened to have been present while all this was going on and being
ageless herself had seen quite a lot and remembers the youth and recounts
his story. He had been brought up only by his mother, his father Gamuret,
having died in battle just before he was born. But before he died he
had pronounced his name. The mother, grief stricken retired into the
woods and brought the boy up in complete seclusion withholding any knowledge
of the outside world or of arms. He was only allowed a bow and arrows
in the use of which he became very proficient. Parsifal however, left
home without telling his mother in order to become a knight. His departure
left the mother so devastated that she died from the effects of this.
All this Kundry recited and Parsifal,
shocked at this account flung himself at Kundry and tried to strangle
her. He was however, restrained by Gurnemanz. It was however, time for
the holy meal and Gurnemanz proceeded with Parsifal to the Grail castle.
A castle of great pillars, a round table, which can be regarded as an
altar, an opening at the top. All the knights gather round the altar.
Amfortas was brought in a litter as has become customary, as he was
too much in pain to walk. A procession of Esquires brings in the Grail,
encased in a box. Titurel, Amfortas' father orders him to uncover the
Grail. At first he refused but after much pressure he relented and uncovered
it. The Grail shines bright and streams of light descend on it from
the height. All receive of this power and the wafer and wine were distributed.
Parsifal witnesses all this without understanding.
He only clutched his heart in compassion in response to Amfortas' pain
and agony. After the ceremony Parsifal looks around dumbfounded not
grasping any of the happenings. Gurnemanz now asks him about what he
had seen but he only shakes his head. The old knight, his hopes apparently
having been mislaid sent the youth away in anger but a voice came from
above in warning about the promised one. Shocked he became pensive but
Parsifal was already gone.
Meanwhile, Klingsor had already seen Parsifal
coming and knew that he could be their greatest foe yet. He summoned
Kundry once more and convinced her to take up the assignment of tempting
Parsifal and added that he who could brave her would save her as she
was living under a curse, which she carried after having mocked Christ
on the cross. Parsifal stumbled upon Klingsor's realm and found himself
after battling his way through among the most beautiful of maidens he
had ever seen. After initially chiding him for wounding their playmates,
they asked that he stay with them. Parsifal soon got tired of their
childish pranks and was about to escape when he heard someone uttered
a name, which had never been uttered. He turned and there appeared the
most beautiful woman he had ever seen: Kundry. Her objective was his
destruction just as she had done with Amfortas.
Using all the pathos she could muster,
she told him about his mother's sorrowful death after he had abandoned
her and promised to fill the void, which was surely to be left. Parsifal
broke down in tears of sorrow for his mother and blamed himself for
her death. Kundry using all her powers of persuasion tried to convince
him that all was not lost and that he should love in a passionate way
like his father did. Parsifal's defences weakened she gave him a long
kiss. During this however, Parsifal suddenly jumped up with an expression
of intense fear clutching his heart and shouted "Amfortas, die Wunde,
die Wunde" (Amfortas, the wound, the wound). The spell had been broken
and all the efforts of Kundry to hold him failed. All her appeals fell
on deaf ears. In a rage, she cursed him to wander and called out to
Klingsor who appeared and hurled the spear at Parsifal hoping that he
would be killed. The spear however remained hovering over Parsifal's
head. He grasped the spear and destroyed the realm with the power that
rested in the spear. Parsifal had recognised what the problem of Amfortas
was through his own experiences. He felt exactly the same pain and with
this he recognised his mission, which was to heal Amfortas and return
to the Grail realm as its king.
Kundry's curse had an effect. Parsifal
was lost for a long time not knowing where to find Amfortas. Eventually
on a Good Friday, he founds his way. He chanced upon the knight Gurnemanz
who had now become a hermit since Amfortas, in a final act of defiance
had pointedly refused for a long time to uncover the Grail. All the
knights were growing old as a result of this and old Titurel died as
a direct result of being denied his manna from heaven, which had kept
him and others alive. Kundry appears again cured of her curse for she
had been braved. She now serves in loyalty. Gurnemanz seeing the spear
was transported with joy and as it was predicted anointed the head of
Parsifal as the new king of the Grail. But they still had to make their
way to the castle where Titurel was being prepared for burial. Amfortas
had promised that on this occasion he would uncover the Grail so that
the body of his father could be sanctified.
The procession came into the hall of the
Grail with Titurel's coffin and all were shocked by the state of his
body when the coffin was removed. Amfortas however, still refused to
uncover the Grail. He tore his clothes revealing the wound which had
already started bleeding again and in the ensuing confusion with the
knights demanding that he must do it enters Parsifal with the holy spear,
Kundry and Gurnemanz. Parsifal points the lance at Amfortas' breast
healing him. Amfortas overwhelmed by the experience staggers back. Parsifal
orders that the Grail be uncovered and should never be concealed. Amfortas
was relieved of his duties, the Grail shines brightest, the chalice
was raised, all kneel worshipping, Kundry falls dying being able at
last to die blameless, and the white dove appears hovering over Parsifal's
head.
By all means the most absorbing and the
most mystical of all the Grail stories. An extraordinary tale, which
induced its creator to declare it sacred and pointedly forbade its performance
outside his theatre. Though he may have borrowed from medieval sources
especially Wolfram, his creativity cannot be denied. The battle between
good and evil was clearly played out and the legends of Arthur took
a back seat. The Grail itself and its central character, Parsifal received
the treatment they deserved. Wagner's aim was to cut off all the frippery
and present us with a crystal clear story, something which had not always
characterised the legends. Many medieval authors in their attempt to
interpret the legends added so much of their own thoughts that the Grail
itself and its central character almost lost their lustre and their
powers of appeal to the human spirit.
The profusion of characters certainly
did not help matters and many authors got bogged down in narrating the
many adventures of the king Arthur that they forgot the central theme,
which was the Grail. Wagner therefore, brought out the essential and
refocused attention once more on the most important, the Grail, the
power of which had induced men in the first place to search for it.
Through his work interest has once more been generated and the quest
once more could be resumed devoid of all externals. The Grail shines
forth once more to exert its power of attraction on those who are open
to this influence. These then would continue the search for it in the
proper manner, their attentions having been redirected and refocused
on the essential and core. The search for the Grail is a religious experience
and all those who have concerned themselves with it have felt this and
this is where attention should shift. The religious and mystical significance
of the Grail is what should be focussed on.
top
What is the Holy Grail in reality? What
is it about it that is able to hold people's imagination with so much
force and persistence? What is it about it that is able to induce men
to abandon all else in its quest? The idea of a chalice is not new to
humanity and it was to be found in the folklore of the peoples of Europe
even before they were converted to Christianity. The Grail itself only
became a Christian symbol as a result of a conscious attempt by some medieval
writers as mentioned above. Drawings of the chalice have been found in
the caves of early man and it is also an important symbol in Greek philosophy
where it was considered to be a bowl in which the Creator mixed the elements
of life. The symbol of the cup was therefore, known to many races but
why was this symbol so universal? Could this vessel be something that
exists independently in Creation, to which each tribe had access? In almost
every tribe it has been associated with power, with knowledge, with cosmology
and even with the origin of life. Could this symbol be universal just
like the stories about the fairies has been universal? Through studying
the legends we get a picture of the characteristics of the Grail.
It was associated with purity and required
that its guardians be the purest of men. Failures in the ranks of its
guardians led to catastrophes as we see in the picture of the Waste
land. It was also associated with blessings. It brought undreamed-of
blessings to those who served it as portrayed in the peace and happiness
that characterised the land when its service was pure. It was also an
object of worship as many came from distant lands to worship through
it. In fact in one of the legends it was during this time that the high
priest failed when he happened to have looked lustfully at a maiden
whose dress was torn when she came to worship. The lance fell on him
as a result giving him the wound.
The Grail was therefore considered to
be a spiritual object more so as it had the power to veil itself from
humanity's gaze when there was no longer purity among the people. It
was also an object that had the power to impart youth and even eternal
life as long as one was able to eat of the wafer that came from it and
as long as one was able to gaze into it. Because of these qualities,
its withdrawal or the inability of its guardians to perform its service
led to widespread disaster. Its blessings no longer flowed, the knights
grew old, some died and the land became a desert thereby specifying
also its effects on Nature. The natural harmony in everything even family
life was disrupted as we see in the work of Chrétien when he said that
ladies would lose their husbands and so on. To uphold its service was
therefore, of the greatest importance if there was to be peace and plenty.
The failure of the fisher king or Anfortas
as he came to be called by Wolfram or Amfortas as Wagner referred to
him who was the first guardian led however, directly to these disasters.
The reasons for their failures or inability to serve the Grail may differ
depending on the version studied, but the effects are the same. Closely
considered, Wagner's version seemed to be the most logical. Examining
Chrétien's work, though left unfinished led to more questions than answers
nor do the "continuations" of the work fully resolve the mystery in
a satisfactory way. Chrétien claimed that the fisher king was wounded
in the thighs by a javelin and the only cure for him was for a stranger
to appear in the castle and ask some questions unprovoked. Parsifal
failed to ask the questions, the king was not cured and as a result
could not rule his land in the proper manner leading to famine and other
natural disasters.
The failure of Parsifal therefore, led
directly to all these disasters and the king himself is absolved of
all blame. Parsifal's failure is in turn attributed to a sin he had
committed against his mother in having left her against her will. This
sin prevented him from asking these questions. Parsifal therefore, takes
all the blame for the king's inability to serve the Grail. But then
Chrétien did not explain the significance of the Grail nor did he as
such attribute abundance in the land to the pure worship of the Grail.
The blessings on the land depended on the king' ability to rule the
land in a justified way. How that burden now came to fall on Parsifal
is far from clear nor was there any supplication for help from the king
which would probably have led to a prophecy of a helper.
Chrétien's work is so disjointed that
it is very difficult to make a logical appraisal and part of the problem
may have been the fact that the work was left unfinished. What we can
conclude is that the Grail according to his work was in a way associated
with a miraculous cure for the king because Parsifal had to ask the
question "Whom does one serve with the Grail?" This question about the
Grail held the cure for the king and only Parsifal could pose this question.
The power of the Grail in bringing blessings on the land was therefore,
associated in an indirect way with the healing of the king through a
question asked about it by Parsifal. Therefore, the Grail was indispensable
to the prosperity of the land. The Grail still holds it central place
in its ability to make the land prosperous through making its ruler
whole.
The ruler's physical well-being therefore,
was impossible without the Grail and Parsifal held the key to it. Nobody
else could ask the question, only he. The prosperity of the land therefore,
depended entirely on Parsifal and the Grail and this thread we see in
most of the stories. What may be illogical is the issue of sin transference.
We know that his mother was unhappy but Parsifal left with her approval
as she had given him advice and had told him to go to Arthur's court.
How then could he be carrying a sin he had not committed.
Much of what has been said above will
also apply to Wolfram's work. The only significant difference was that
as has already been mentioned he considered the Grail to be a stone
rather than a chalice. Much of the blame for the catastrophes was to
be taken by Parsifal. Wolfram however, went further and placed his work
in a prophetic context for he mentioned that the agony of the king was
so great that the brothers in the realm prayed to God for a deliverer
and a prophecy that a knight would come and he would ask the relevant
questions on his own accord, (the king would be healed as a result and
would be succeeded by him), appeared on the Grail stone. The predicted
deliverer appeared however, failed and the kingdom became a waste land.
He however, after many years found his way, asked the questions, restores
the king's health and becomes king himself.
The same difficulty is encountered as
to how Parsifal could take on blame for what he had not done. The Grail,
though considered to be a stone still held the same characteristics
of restoring the kingdom as long as Parsifal asked the right questions.
Its spiritual origin was undoubted as it was said to have come from
heaven through angels who were neutral when war broke out between God
and Lucifer. Chrétien did not specify the origin of the Grail, but dealt
only with its qualities. Wolfram's inconsistencies could be borne out
by the fact that it is difficult to explain a situation where Parsifal,
the knight who had been predicted to heal the king would already be
coming with a burden of guilt on his shoulders. In that case he could
not have been pure enough to serve the Grail, as the Grail required
the purest of men to serve it.
With Wagner, Amfortas took the blame for
everything as his failure to serve the Grail was his own fault and this
failure led directly to calamities even the death of his own father.
Here we have an almost perfect work with not too many loop holes. The
prayers of the brotherhood, combined with that of Amfortas led to a
promise of a helper. This helper would be sent by God to help deliver
Amfortas from his pains. Wagner's works also suffers from this problem
of always burdening Parsifal with some kind of guilt. Parsifal's own
guilt however (that of abandoning his mother) did not prevent him from
asking the relevant questions as he asked the old knight Gurnemanz what
the Grail was. The question however, was not important as it was not
relevant to the king's well being.
The king's well-being depended on his
being able to serve the Grail unblemished free from pain, from his wounds.
Where Parsifal contributed to the death of Titurel and the development
of the waste land was in his getting lost and not finding his way to
the castle early enough. But he was not to blame for that as this was
due to the curse of Kundry on him. Therefore, looked at critically Parsifal,
even in Wagner's play had no guilt as he was not really responsible
for the death of Titurel. He lost his way not of his own accord but
as a result of some measure of fate. He still had a burden of guilt
on him however, as Wagner insinuated that he had left home against the
will of his mother thereby continuing in the vein of Chrétien and Wolfram.
It could be assumed that Wagner still
introduced this theme to make way for the scene between him and Kundry
where she would attempt to use this against him in an attempt to break
down his defences. But as mentioned above, Parsifal could not have been
guilty of leaving against his mother's will as he was given leave by
her and even got some good advice from her. In Wagner's work we see
the direct effect of the Grail itself. In earlier works it had been
indirect and depended on the healing powers it would have if the right
questions were asked about it. Here the Grail itself was the central
symbol with its hero Parsifal.
Its proper service had led to blessings
undreamed-of but when its first guardian failed as a result of his own
guilt we also saw the consequences of its direct neglect. The failure
to uncover the Grail had disastrous consequences. These consequences
has nothing to do with Parsifal as he had not caused the Grail not to
be uncovered even though Wagner still tried to imply this in the delay
Parsifal suffered when he lost his way although due to no fault of his.
The healing of Amfortas depended not on questions about the Grail but
according to Wagner through pity, through knowing. The healing of Amfortas
and consequently the service of the Grail depended on the personal involvement
of Parsifal.
It is difficult to understand what Wagner
meant by those words just by reading or hearing them but as the play
unfolded one was forced to conclude that Parsifal would have through
his own experiences come to know what the problem with Amfortas was.
He had to follow the same road as Amfortas did, he had to be exposed
to the same temptations and through his own experiences realise what
exactly had befallen the Grail kingdom. On kissing Kundry he shouted
"Amfortas! The wound! The wound!" revealing that he had received the
knowledge and as such the solution to all the problems. The Grail would
never fail to release its blessings as long as there was somebody to
uncover it. Amfortas, in blind pain had at last defied everybody and
refused utterly to serve the Grail because as long as he continued to
look into the Grail he would never die thereby making his pain eternal.
He therefore, by this refusal wished for death.
He was ready to take everybody with him
as the consequences of this refusal to uncover the Grail is a slow death
for everybody as happened with his father. Having won the holy spear
back in a grievous battle with Kundry and Klingsor, Parsifal now set
to look for Amfortas. The Grail, in Wagner's work received one of the
most beautiful treatments and was certainly a vessel of the greatest
spiritual significance. The power that emanated from it led to the greatest
reverence and worship as could be seen from the attitude of the knights.
It was an independently radiating vessel whose light outshone the surrounding
lights, a characteristic also mentioned in Chrétien's work.
Now the question is, could such an object
of such spiritual significance be of earthly origin? Could it really
be the cup that was used by Jesus during the last supper and in which
His blood was later collected? Though this vessel could be considered
as sacred since it was associated with Jesus but could that cup of the
last supper be the cup that could hold men in such rapture? As mentioned
above, diagrams of the chalice have been seen in caves of ancient men
and the chalice was certainly known even before the advent of Christianity
and was only adopted as a Christian symbol only relatively recently
in the Middle Ages. Why did the Greeks consider it as the matrix of
Creation? Why this consistency in its association with power, blessings,
purity and service? These are questions that have not been resolved.
The Grail has also many times been associated
with Paradise as can be seen in the earlier works on the Grail legend.
Because the chalice or the Grail was already known even before the advent
of Christianity, the idea that it was the cup, which Jesus used during
the last supper is already out of the question. That single fact alone
completely disqualifies this concept. That cup of the last supper moreover
was a physical cup, which in any case over time would have to decay,
a concept totally inconceivable with the Grail. The legends surely did
not convey the idea of a cup that would age and decay. In addition how
could a cup, which was supposed to impart eternal life itself decay
which would in the natural course of events would have to happen.
Some might say that since it had been
associated with Jesus then it at the same time acquired the quality
of remaining eternal. Lofty as this idea may sound, it did not detract
from the fact that in the end this cup was a physical one whereas the
actual Grail from what one can garner from the legends is spiritual.
It even had the power to conceal itself from the gazes of sinners. It
is difficult to accept that any physical cup had that quality.
What then is the Grail? In the book "In
the Light of Truth" the Grail Message by Abd-ru-shin, we read "At the
summit of the eternal sphere of Spiritual Substantiality stands the
Castle of the Grail, spiritually visible and tangible, because it is
still of the same species of spiritual substantiality. This Castle of
the Grail contains a Sanctuary which lies on the outermost border adjacent
to the Divine Sphere, and is thus of still finer consistency than the
rest of spiritual substantiality. In this Sanctuary, as a pledge of
the eternal Goodness of God the Father, as a symbol of His Purest Divine
Love, and the point from which Divine Power issues, stands the Holy
Grail! This is a chalice in which it bubbles and surges unceasingly
like red blood without overflowing. Enveloped as it is in the most Luminous
Light, it is granted only to the purest of all spirits in the Realm
of Spiritual Substantiality to look into this Light! These are Guardians
of the Holy Grail!"
The Holy Grail according to this book
lies at the summit of the spiritual creation. This would identify the
Grail as a spiritual object, a view, which is consistent with the legends
where the Grail had been associated with Paradise.
The Grail therefore has a spiritual origin
but more than that it has its origin at the summit of this realm. As
we find in the legends, the Grail always resides in a castle called
the Grail castle and this would be consistent with what Abd-ru-shin
says of the Holy Grail occupying a sanctuary called the Castle of the
Grail. Abd-ru-shin gives a clue as to why the Grail had been associated
with power and with blessings when he referred to it as the point from
which Divine Power issues. This Divine Power that issues from it is
what is responsible for the blessings and the immense effect it has
on people. The Holy Grail therefore, has its origin in the spiritual
realm and only the purest from this realm are allowed to be its guardians.
If the Holy Grail therefore has its origin at such height, a height
as we are told in religion that no sin can ever enter, a realm synonymous
with Paradise, how then are we to explain the failure of the fisher
king or Amfortas or whatever we may want to call him.
If the guardians are the purest of spirits,
then it is impossible for them to fail. If therefore, no sin can ever
enter into Paradise, why this apparent contradiction because as mentioned
above, if the paradisal realm is perfect and as indeed it should be,
then there could be no question of a failing of its first guardian.
Certainly not at that point where Divine Power issues. Certainly such
a place cannot be transformed to be a waste land. Paradise cannot from
what we know so far about it be transformed into a waste land as a result
of the failure of its first priest. This cannot be explained away by
saying that after all Adam and Eve failed in Paradise.
This is also one of the inconsistencies
that characterise the human story. Adam and Eve could not have failed
either in Paradise as no sin could ever enter into this. We would divert
a little and say that there could have been no question of a failure
of an Adam and Eve because their expulsion from Paradise was not a consequence
of any failure for the reasons already mentioned. If they were expelled
from Paradise it would have been for quite different and much more plausible
reasons, not a failure which was impossible in any case. Please see
the lecture "The Development of Creation" in the book "In the Light
of Truth", The Grail Message by Abd-ru-shin.
If therefore, no sin could ever be found
in the spiritual Grail, which Grail was then referred to by the legends?
We quote again from Abd-ru-shin's book "If it is said in the legends
that the purest of men are destined to become Guardians of the Grail,
this is a point about which the blessed poet has drawn all too earthly
a picture, because he was unable to express himself differently! No
human spirit can enter this holy Sanctuary! Even in its most perfect
state of spiritual substantiality, after having returned from its wanderings
through the World of Matter, it is still not so fine that it could cross
this threshold, i.e., the boundary line! ... The Guardians of the Grail
are Eternal Primordial Spiritual Beings, who were never human beings.
They are the highest of all in the Realm of Spiritual Substantiality."
Fallible human beings therefore were never
guardians of the Holy Grail. The actual Guardians of the Grail were
higher spiritual creatures described as Primordial Beings. We read further
"There actually is a Castle where an Amfortas dwelt, who for a time
was considered the first guardian there. In this castle there is a vessel
called the "Grail", which is faithfully guarded by the knights.
It was indeed there that Amfortas actually
met his downfall, and where a great helper was promised. But this happened
neither on earth nor in the high Light Castle of Primordial Creation!
The Castle which is revealed there (where Amfortas was) is even today
still to be found as the highest point on a plane in which the Created
Beings have their field of activity towards the developed ones. In their
purest volition and worship of God, they possess only an imitation of
the Light Castle. This Light Castle radiates down from the highest place
in Primordial Creation and as the actual Castle of the Holy Grail, also
forms the exit gate from the Divine Sphere of Radiation." The actual
Grail was therefore not referred to in the legends but only an imitation
present in material creation although at its summit.
It is only at this place, which already
is part of the material sphere can imperfection enter and the first
guardian fail. Never could this failure happen for purely logical reasons
in the actual Grail Castle where its Guardians were perfect spiritual
creatures, not fallible human beings. The guardians of the Castle where
Amfortas was once active where human beings and this would explain their
fallibility. The legends were therefore happenings, which a few writers
were able to receive through inspiration and set down. Inevitably however,
their imagination crept in which led to inconsistencies and variations
depending on how big a role the imagination played.
We have therefore, made mention of two
Grails: the actual Grail, which lies at the summit of the spiritual
realm and an imitation of the first, which lies lower down in material
creation. The first is the actual real Grail, the point from which divine
Power issues. It has its actual existence in a place where no sin can
enter. This fact eliminates the possibility that an Amfortas could have
met his downfall in such a place. The second is an imitation of the
first, present in material creation although at its height, where evil
is already to some extent established and it must have been at this
lower lying imitation that Amfortas met with his downfall.
What does the Grail signify however? We
have already examined what the legends say about it. Let us however,
go a bit further. The Grail signifies more than what we have hitherto
been able to depict. The Greeks as mentioned above have associated it
with the matrix of Creation and to almost all peoples who have been
able to divine it, was regarded as a symbol of immense power. Abd-ru-shin
in his book as was already mentioned also says that it is the point
from which Divine Power issues.
Could this explain why without the proper
service of the Grail during the time that it was left uncovered in Wagner's
work or during the time when supposedly Parsifal fails to ask the question,
the land becomes wasted and the guardians' bodies degenerated? Denied
of this power, the land could no longer regenerate. The knights too
who depended on this power for their sustenance also slowly shrank away.
Looking at the legends, one could conclude that everything in the realm
depended on the Grail including even the natural world.
The rivers, plants, animals even the lives
of people, family life and so on. Could it be that being denied the
power that issues from the Grail was being denied the Power that issues
from God? At least this was how the writers of the legends perceived
it. For those who believe in God, Nature and everything in it depends
on His Power. Could this Power be equivalent or identical to that which
issues from the Grail? Why do calamities arise when the realm was denied
the Grail?
Why does the place become a desert? Why
do rivers no longer flow? Are these stories to be dismissed only as
legends and sagas or be seen as a reflection of what actually takes
place? We quote again from Abd-ru-shin "From time to time on the Day
of the Holy Dove, the Dove appears above the Chalice as a renewed token
of the unalterable Divine Love of the Father. It is the hour of communion,
which brings about the renewal of power. The Guardians of the Grail
receive in humble devotion and can then transmit this magic power. On
this depends the existence of the whole Creation! It is the moment in
which the Love of the Creator radiantly flows forth in the Temple of
the Holy Grail, bringing new life and a new urge to create, pulsating
downwards and diffusing itself through all the Universe. A trembling
and a holy awe, with forebodings of joy and great happiness, vibrate
through all the spheres. Only the spirit of earthman still stands aside,
without intuitively sensing what is happening particularly to him at
that moment; or in what a dull-witted manner he accepts such an immeasurable
gift....It is the moment when a new supply of vital energy is sent out
into the entire Creation! It is the necessary, ever-recurring ratification
of the Covenant between the Creator and His Work! Should this supply
ever be cut off, should it ever fail to come, inevitably all that exists
would slowly dry up, grow old and disintegrate. The end of all days
would then come, and only God Himself would remain, as it was in the
beginning, because He alone is Life!"
The Grail legends therefore, may not be
seen or dismissed just as sagas or stories but may well represent a
particular reality of life. Abd-ru-shin's description here uncannily
resemble what the legends themselves have depicted about the Grail.
Life-giving, source of power and an object held in awe and worship.
An object that showers blessings on those who recognise it. An object
through which power is given to the lands for their renewal and regeneration
and without which they would be turned to waste. This object therefore
could not possibly have been the cup which Jesus and His disciples
used for the Last Supper. This cup is more.
top
Parsifal has been linked with the Grail since the
inception of the legends as the hero, the knight who would eventually
be the king of the Grail. He it is who has it in his power according
to the legends to heal the king and bring prosperity to the land.
In the earlier legends, he failed to ask the questions concerning
the Grail and the consequences were disastrous. He however, realised
his mistakes, went back, asked the relevant questions, heals the maimed
king as a result and succeeds him. Parsifal therefore, becomes king
of the Grail. In Wolfram's work, he was the prophesied knight whose
prediction had appeared on the stone after the guardians had prayed
for a healer for their king who was continuously in agony.
This theme was pursued further by Wagner in the idea
of the coming of der reine Tor, the pure fool or simpleton,
whom the brotherhood were to await. Amfortas himself had received
this vision and the brotherhood came to expect this innocent healer.
Part of the prediction was that Parsifal would become the king of
the Grail and that it would be Gurnemanz hand that would anoint his
head. This so much we learn from Act Three of the opera. Therefore,
in almost all the writings on the legends Parsifal was the innocent
who was always prophesied and who would eventually be crowned king
of the Grail. Throughout all the writings, Parsifal would always be
the one to attain to the Grail, though in some writings especially
those of the Vulgate cycle, others like Galahad and Bors would also
attain it but the association of Parsifal's name with the attainment
of the Grail is far more consistent than these other two and in all
the works only Parsifal becomes king.
If Parsifal was predicted as Wolfram and
Wagner suggested and as can even be surmised from the works of Chrétien,
one would normally ask the question: where then does he come from? If
the brotherhood had prayed to God for a helper for the sorrows of their
first guardian and their prayers were answered through a prophesy, does
it mean then that the coming of Parsifal was the answer to this prayer?
One would have to look at the effects
of Parsifal's coming to be able to answer this question. His coming
led once more to the uncovering of the Grail as we see in Wagner's work
and the restoration of the land. His coming led to the recovery of the
lost spear.His coming led to the healing of Amfortas. In Wolfram's work,
his coming led also to the healing of the maimed king and the rivers
flowed again. It would then appear that the coming of Parsifal achieved
the desired objective. In praying the knights had a desire, an expectation.
This desire and expectation made them pray so that these desires and
expectations would be fulfilled. A prophecy came as a result and the
promised knight brought about the fulfilment of all the expectations
of the brotherhood. If their supplication went up to God, then the question
would be: did God then send him? If so, from where? Parsifal then must
have his existence somewhere for him to have been in a position to be
sent as a response to a prayer from the brotherhood.
Why is his name always associated with
Grail? The regularity with which this occurs must make us begin to think
that this name must indeed be synonymous with the Grail and probably
inseparable from it. It is almost unthinkable to conceive a legend about
the Grail without this character. His characteristics are innocence,
purity and guilelessness. Somebody who had grown up with no knowledge
of the world and who had even forgotten his identity. He was sent on
a mission, that much we know, but by whom? And from where? If the brotherhood
had prayed to God and Parsifal appeared and fulfilled all the expectations,
which the brotherhood would have expected a messenger from God to fulfil
then we must conclude that he was sent by God.
Was he then a messenger from God? We can
conclude that he was for the reasons already stated. Then we have an
innocent, guileless, pure messenger from God whose name is forever associated
with the Grail. But why is that? Why is his name forever associated
with the Grail? Why is he always the protagonist in the Grail drama.
Why must he always be the one to achieve the Grail? Why must he always
become king as the legends consistently say? Why is he always the answer
to the Grail problem? To put things in perspective once more, we must
realise as already mentioned that the Grail Castle where Amfortas failed
was the lower lying imitation of the actual Grail Castle which lies
in the highest spiritual heights where the effects of sin can never
be found.
If then Parsifal was sent he would have
had to descend from where he was to the level where there was affliction.
He could not perchance have ascended to that level. If he was coming
as a messenger from God, then he would have had to descend in a downward
direction as that was the only logical direction he could have followed.
If Parsifal then was a higher being who originated in a plane much higher
than that of Amfortas, then he could not descend from his higher region
to become the king of the Grail in a lower region and remain there.
A messenger never tarries on a mission.
He fulfils his mission and returns to
his master. If Parsifal then is to fulfil the true meaning of a messenger
then he could never have tarried in Amfortas' realm. After fulfilling
his mission he would inevitably have moved on. Then Parsifal did not
become king of the Grail in the lower lying region of Amfortas because
as a messenger on a mission he could not have tarried there as king.
Then why is Parsifal referred to then as king of the Grail? Parsifal
entered the Grail castle in Amfortas' realm not to become the king of
the Grail and tarry there but he entered that Castle as King of the
Grail! He was therefore, always King of the actual real Grail in the
Highest Heights.
He is therefore King of the Holy Grail
on a Mission of the Redemption of all the Worlds. Healing Amfortas was
just one of the missions He fulfilled on His descent. He as a Messenger
of God therefore, could not have tarried in this realm but had to move
on as He was on a Mission and messengers on missions do not tarry wherever
they were supposed to bring help. Their stay is always of short duration.
Therefore, Parsifal entered that realm as King, resolved the problem
and moved on. Parsifal therefore, in the legends is referred to as king
of the Grail not because he became king but because he was already King
of the actual Holy Grail because as mentioned, being a messenger he
could not have tarried.
If Parsifal therefore, is King of the
actual Holy Grail in the spiritual realm and this Holy Grail as mentioned
earlier is the point from which Divine Power issues, then Parsifal must
be associated with this Divine Power. If Parsifal is the King of the
Holy Grail, it would help explain the reasons for the consistency in
the association of the name with the Grail. It simply means that from
time immemorial He has always been the King otherwise we would not have
this degree of consistency in the legends.
The question then as to where Parsifal
came from and as to where God sent him from can be seen to have been
resolved. If the Holy Grail exists at the summit of Creation, then its
King obviously also has His Being at this height. Parsifal therefore,
is to be found at the summit of the entire Creation and is to be found
as the King of the Vessel from which Divine Power issues. And it is
on this Power that the whole of Creation depends which is already implicated
in the legends. If Parsifal then is the King of the Grail then it is
reasonable to assume that it is He who dispenses this Power, which issues
from the Grail.
We have referred to Abd-ru-shin's reference
to the Dove, which appears on the Chalice as a "renewed token of the
unalterable Love of the Father." This reference to the Dove is stunning
if one remembers Wagner's work where he says "The ray of light falls
from above, and the Grail glows brightest. From the dome descends a
white dove and hovers over Parsifal's head." Wagner associated the Dove
with Parsifal. Many people have found it baffling the association of
the Dove with Parsifal and this association has not been understood.
The Dove is commonly associated with the
Power of God, with the Spirit. The association of the Dove with Grail
as Abd-ru-shin says is understandable because if the Grail dispenses
Divine Power and the Dove is the symbol of Divine Power it stands to
reason that the Dove must be associated with the Grail. But Wagner's
association of the Dove with Parsifal needs further elaboration. It
stands to reason that if Parsifal is the King of the Grail which dispenses
Divine Power and which is associated with the Dove then this Dove must
as a matter of logic be associated with the King of the Vessel with
which this Dove is associated. Parsifal therefore, by logical extension
is the first in Creation since He is King of the Vessel, which lies
at the summit of Creation. He is therefore, not "der reine Tor" (in
German) meaning the pure fool as Wagner makes us believe, but das
reine Tor (the pure Gate). He is the Gate from the Divine to
man.
Since God lies outside of the Creations
and Parsifal is the first in Creation it is obvious then that He stands
at the summit of Creation as the Last if looking from below upwards
and as such as the gateway to the Divine. He is therefore, logically
speaking the First and the Last in Creation. Looking from above downwards,
He is the First and looking from below upwards He is the Last. Parsifal
is therefore, much more than we think. It is a shock to realise this
considering what our conceptions have been in the past. He is therefore,
the Alpha and Omega of Creation. He is therefore, the Gate from God
to man (das reine Tor).
This is a little error from Wagner because
it is easy to confuse his characteristics, which Wagner described as
being a fool with what really He represents. If looked at properly however,
his characteristics do not indicate a fool at all. The words innocent,
guileless, are more descriptive. For the sake of drama or probably out
of ignorance, Wagner choose the wrong substantive in his transmission.
Considered objectively, the expression das reine Tor is
far more appropriate. You are not a fool just because you are pure or
innocent or even just because you are ignorant of a particular matter,
or because you are not cunning.
top
Why would God send the King of the Grail down below
to help the knights of the brotherhood? Why should He have been sent
on a Mission just to resolve this problem? The simple answer is He
was not sent just to resolve this problem. We have to examine this
matter a little bit deeper if we are to reach a conclusion as to why
Parsifal found Himself in the imitation of the Castle down below.
"Harre sein, der reine Tor" we read from Wagner, but as already mentioned,
it should have been "Harre sein, das reine Tor" the pure Gate which
means "wait for him the pure Gate." People over the centuries have
assumed that the Holy Spirit is something amorphous, intangible, with
no form, yet we all agree that It is a Part of the Holy Trinity: God
the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.
If in our minds, these other members of the Holy
Trinity are personal, have a form so to speak, why can we not assume
the same of the Holy Spirit. If the Love of God is embodied in Jesus,
what stops His Power or His Spirit from also being embodied? From
also having a form? His Spirit therefore, is represented in Parsifal
and embodied in Him.
This Spirit of God was first mentioned
in Genesis 1:2 "And the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the
waters" which would indicate a close association of the Spirit with
the process of Creating. In fact many people have come to the recognition
that the creative Part of God is His Spirit, the Holy Spirit and that
is probably why He is concerned with the dispensation of Power for its
maintenance. Not only then is the Holy Spirit concerned with the coming
into being of the Creations, He is also concerned with its maintenance.
This He does through the Holy Grail, which
is the subject of the legends we have been discussing. The Holy Spirit
therefore, pours out the Power through the Holy Grail to the Creations
for their continuous existence. If the Holy Spirit does not pour out
this Power through the Holy Grail, then as has been said in the legends,
everything would dry up. Parsifal therefore, as the Spirit of God is
responsible not only for the creating but also for the maintenance of
the Creations. Since the Creations have Laws, He is also responsible
for the maintenance of the Laws that guide the Creations. If He is therefore,
concerned with the Laws, then He must also be concerned with Justice
within Creation. He is therefore, the Justice of God embodied. He who
is concerned with the Laws is also as a matter of course the upholder
of the Justice that must exist within the work. If He is therefore,
concerned with Justice, He must also be concerned with Judgement.
The Justice of God and the Judgement of
God go hand in hand. The Judgement therefore, is the responsibility
of Parsifal. We quote Abd-ru-shin again "Christ Himself said that sins
against God the Father and against God the Son could be forgiven, but
never those committed against the "Holy Spirit"! Does the Holy Spirit
then stand higher or is it more than God the Father and God the Son?....The
Holy Spirit is the Will of God the Father, the Spirit of Truth Which,
severed from him, works separately in all Creation, and yet like the
Love, in the form of the Son, remains closely connected with the Father
and one with Him....The Holy Spirit is Executive Justice, Whose eternal,
irrevocable and incorruptible laws pulsate throughout the Universe.
Up till now these laws have only been guessed at and variously described
as...Fate...Karma...Divine Will!"
If then the Spirit of God is responsible
for Justice or Judgement how do we prove this? Is the Judgement not
the responsibility of Jesus? In John 14:25-26, we read "These things
I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counsellor,
the Holy Spirit, whom the father will send in my name, he will teach
you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to
you." Jesus here has obviously referred to the Holy Spirit in person
and He referred to Him as he, which means that Jesus regards the Holy
Spirit as being personal. Here Jesus predicted the coming of the Holy
Spirit although contemporary religion has interpreted this coming to
be the event that took place at Whitsuntide when the power from the
Holy Spirit descended on the disciples at Pentecost and tongues of flame
were distributed amongst them. Even this extraordinary event at Pentecost
can be explained in the light of the legends alone when for example
the Grail appeared at king Arthur's table at Pentecost.
The image of the Grail was so spectacular
that as from then on several of Arthur's knights vowed to seek after
the Grail. What happened at Pentecost with Arthur and with the Disciples
of Jesus is always so at Pentecost. It is when the Holy Grail sends
out Power to the whole of Creation for its renewal and rebirth. This
is an event which always recurs every year at this period and that was
why the Grail made its appearance because this power comes from It as
has been explained.
The gathering of the disciples coincided
with the day of the Pentecost and being open spiritually, they experienced
the rapture, which is always connected with the Grail. And this rapture
is already explained in the legends themselves in that the knights are
always held in rapture whenever the Grail dispenses its blessings. The
reason is that the human spirits at such moments receive of the Power
of God as dispensed through the Holy Grail and the effect of this Power
on the human spirit borders on the miraculous. The disciples therefore,
experienced the effects of the Power of the Grail on themselves. This
is however, not the fulfilment that Jesus meant by His prediction concerning
the Holy Spirit. This was obviously not a personal fulfilment, as one
would be forced to conclude if these words were critically examined.
Jesus however, went further in John 14:30
"I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is
coming. He has no power over me." What did Jesus mean by this statement.
Who is the ruler of the world? From what we have been discussing so
far the answer to this question would be obvious. The Holy Spirit is
the ruler of this world. He is ruler simply because He is the Creative
Will of God. He is that Part of the Holy Trinity whose responsibility
it is to guide and maintain the Creations.
In maintaining and guiding however, He
rules. Jesus goes further to say that this ruler has no power over him.
This means that this Ruler of the world and Jesus are equals. They are
both Parts of the Holy Trinity, both Sons of God and as such they are
equal. Nobody else can be an equal to Jesus apart from the Holy Spirit.
And then He says that this Ruler is coming. This other Part of the Trinity
is coming. This Spirit of God will be sent to teach us all things and
will be sent in the name of Jesus. All this goes to confirm what has
been said concerning the Holy Spirit or Parsifal. Jesus went further
and said that the Holy Spirit will teach us all things and will bring
to our remembrance all that He had said to us. From this it looks like
a personal fulfilment is involved here. Somebody has to come to bring
Christ's teachings to our remembrance. Jesus also called Him a Counsellor.
A Counsellor obviously cannot be some
form of amorphous power. Properly considered a Counsellor has to come
personally and counsel. He went further in John 15:7-8, "Nevertheless,
I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if
I do not go away, the Counsellor will not come to you. And when he comes
he will reprove the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgement."
Jesus Himself has proven that the task of the Holy Spirit is Judgement.
Therefore Parsifal is concerned with Judgement, with reproving the world
of sin and righteousness. From Jesus' words Himself one could easily
conclude that the task of judging was not going to be administered by
Him but by another whose duty it has been right from the beginning to
do this.
Parsifal therefore, is the embodiment
of the Holy Spirit whose duty it is to administer the Judgement. In
His Mission however, of reproving the world of sin, he had to explain
to us once more the Message of Christ. This is why Jesus alluded to
the Spirit of Truth bringing His Words to our remembrance. Jesus went
further in John 16:12-14 "I have yet many things to say to you, but
you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of Truth comes, he will guide
you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority,
but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the
things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is
mine and declare it to you." This is obviously the promise of the coming
of one who will fulfil all these.
This is to be regarded as a prophecy from
Jesus of the coming of someone who will come and personally fulfil this
prophecy. It is doubtful whether we can conclude that all that Jesus
prophesied was fulfilled at Whitsuntide. There was no Judgement, there
was no new teaching and the world was not reproved of any sin but on
the contrary sins multiplied. All the diversion I have made is to try
to clarify the issue of why Parsifal found Himself on the plane of Amfortas.
Being the Holy Spirit or the Spirit of
Truth He was on a general Mission for all the Worlds and being on a
Mission of Redemption for all the World and since as Christ prophesied
He had to be personally involved in everything, it is then not surprising
that He also became personally involved in the Grail story of Amfortas.
The reason He became personally involved is already clear from what
Christ prophesied as quoted above but is also explained by Wagner in
Parsifal (der reine Tor, "durch Mittleid, wissend") meaning through
pity, knowing. Parsifal's inability initially to understand Amfortas'
problem until he had personally gone through the same experience.
Parsifal had to go through the same ordeal
and temptations and experiences like Amfortas for him to be in a position
to help. Then the words of Wagner should have been "das reine
Tor, durch Erfahrung, Wissen" the pure Gate through experience,
knowledge. It was only through the experiences, which he had to go through
that he gained the knowledge to help Amfortas. When he first made his
entrance into the Grail castle he did not understand what was going
on, he could not understand Amfortas' pain. After going through all
of the experiences however, he was now in a position to help through
his knowledge, hence "the pure Gate, through experience, knowledge".
This is already indicated in the way
the drama unfolded. Parsifal coming as he did from out of the Light
had absolutely no knowledge of evil, hence his innocence, and hence
his lack of understanding for what befell Amfortas. He soon gained knowledge
of it however, through all his experiences including through his encounters
with Kundry and Klingsor. With these experiences his eyes became open
and he recognised his mission. Thus, Parsifal in order to be an effective
Counsellor or Teacher first had to know what the problems with human
beings were. He first had to come to know evil and all the consequences.
He first had to experience evil on Himself
and through these experiences, would gain the knowledge necessary to
help mankind. Having experienced all the evil in that realm He then
was in a position to help Amfortas, not before. He was therefore, on
a Mission of redemption for all the worlds and since Amfortas' realm
was not the only realm besought by evil He could not have tarried there.
He moved on to other parts in the fulfilment of His Mission and inevitably
He would find Himself on earth also in fulfilment of the Mission prophesied
by Jesus so long ago. Just like it happened in Amfortas' plane, He would
first have to gather his experiences, come to experience all the evil
that were wont to befall man and through these experiences gain the
knowledge to be able to offer help out of this darkness at the right
time. Jesus said as much that He would guide us into all truth.
Through His experiences on earth and
also on all the planes that make up the entire Creation, He would be
in a position to offer advice and help for all those wishing to free
themselves from the effects of the darkness. In his book "In the Light
of Truth" the Grail Message, Abd-ru-shin says "To think of Parsifal
as the Son of the Light, Who descends into Creation from above, Who
is not perchance lifted up from below; to think of Him as the beginning
and the end in Creation, the A and the O for all the weaving outside
of the Divine, and therewith King of the Holy Grail, King of Creation!
Parsifal's great work of purification which leads Him personally through
the worlds, with the unreserved condition that He must through His own
experiencing learn to know all the evil, which work was bound to end
with the fettering of Lucifer for the protection of the Creations and
of all the creatures that remain after the purification."
His battle with evil was depicted in Wagner's
opera when not only did He have to face temptation with the flower maidens
and then Kundry, He also had to face Klingsor who tried to kill him
with the spear. Parsifal's struggles was not only depicted by Wagner
however, but is to be found in the earlier legends where he encountered
on two separate occasions two ladies who tried to tempt him. With him
therefore there had always been the struggle he had to have with the
forces of darkness. One would have wondered why this was so but we now
know the answer to this question. The consistency with which the writers
of the legends mention this in their stories would bear this fact out.
The Grail legends therefore, if
looked at objectively and critically enough, may well represent a reality
of life. The decision to examine it critically and to look for its meaning
in the experiences of our lives however, rests with each individual
alone.
top
The Spear in the Grail legends has been
regarded as the spear, which the Roman soldier used to pierce the side
of Jesus on the cross. This spear, having been associated with Jesus
was considered sacred by most religious people especially as this spear
had touched the Blood of Christ. The Spear also could be regarded as
a symbol of power as it was used by Parsifal to destroy the kingdom
of Klingsor and turned the whole ream into a desert. Amfortas took the
spear with him when he went to challenge Klingsor with the assurance
that as long as he had the spear with him, his victory against Klingsor
was guaranteed. The Spear therefore, meant a lot to the inhabitants
of the Grail realm. It was also an object that inspired reverence in
the brotherhood.
If we take Wagner's opera as an allegory,
then the brotherhood represented the forces of good while Kundry and
Klingsor would represent the forces of evil. Klingsor could even be
regarded as representing Lucifer in a way; he had appropriated the Spear
and was obviously misusing it. With him the spear came to rest in the
wrong hands. He had even used this spear to wound Amfortas. Not many
people understand the concept of the evil, which Lucifer brought. What
we understand about him is that he is the fallen archangel. An archangel
who was once with God but fell through his own guilt.
What we have been able to garner from
reading the Revelations is that Lucifer was sent to help humanity but
instead of helping became our accuser. In Revelations 12:10 we read
"And I heard a loud voice in heaven saying, "Now the salvation and the
power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have
come, for the accuser of our brethren, has been thrown down, who accuses
them day and night before our God." Lucifer therefore, instead of fulfilling
that for which he was sent down here to do could not wait for the gradual
maturing of humanity and introduced his own system which to him was
to speed up our maturing.
He always accused human beings whom he
had been given charge. He always complained about his duties, about
having to be burdened with the trouble of looking after such sloppy
ones as us, hence this statement. Lucifer could not wait for the gradual
maturing of his wards because he was impatient and lacked love. We quote
Abd-ru-shin "The dissension started after the creation of all matter
had begun.
Sent out to support Spiritual Substantiality
and further its development in the World of Matter, he failed to carry
out his mission in accordance with the Creative Will of God the Father
but, through a volition, which came to him while working in matter,
he chose ways other than those ordained by this Creative Will. Misusing
the power delegated to him, he introduced among other things the principle
of temptation in place of the principle of supporting help, which is
identical with serving love; serving love in the Divine sense, which
has nothing to do with slavish servility, but only has the spiritual
ascent and thereby the eternal happiness of his fellow men at heart
and acts accordingly!
The principle of temptation, however,
is identical with the setting of snares which cause creatures who are
not sufficiently strong within themselves quickly to stumble, fall and
become lost, whereas others, it is true, grow stronger and more alert
so as to blossom forth powerfully towards spiritual heights. But all
that is weak is irrevocably abandoned to destruction from the start.
This principle knows of no goodness, no compassion; it is wanting in
the love of God the Father, and therewith also in the mightiest power
to ascend and in the strongest support available."
Lucifer therefore, instead of performing
his duties faithfully and patiently awaiting the slow maturing of human
beings, decided that he could not wait, as we were too slow, lamenting
always and finally found a 'faster' way for our maturing. The fact that
his methods would lead to the destruction of many did not concern him
as long as it made his work easier. He thereby introduced as mentioned
above the principle of temptation with which most of us are familiar.
Having being sent down by God, he was given a power so that he would
be able to perform his duties. This power is the Divine Power of supporting
love. This power, he completely misused and perverted and ultimately
used it to inflict a deep wound on the realm of the spirit.
Most human spirits that have left Paradise
in order to come here to mature could not find their way back and as
a result their cycles of existence could not be completed thereby creating
a huge gap in this cycle. This gap was created as a result of the application
of his principles. Lucifer therefore, through the application of his
principle inflicted a wound on the spiritual realm, which weakened this
realm because most out-flowing human spirits remained trapped in the
material world without the possibility of being able to make it back
to Paradise.
This realm therefore, became depleted
and as a result weakened. He had used the power given by God to do this.
This continual outflow of human spirits symbolically speaking is like
the continuous draining of a wound that would not close. The continual
haemorrhaging of human spirits from the spiritual realm. A huge gap
that indeed will never close until his principles were no longer applied.
This will now allow those human spirits trapped in material creation
to now find their way back into the spiritual realm thereby automatically
closing the wound. The same power, which was used to inflict the wound
must also be the power that would heal it. With Lucifer, the Power of
God thereby came to lie in the wrong hands. This Power therefore must
be wrested from him and then lying in the right hands can then be used
to heal the realm of the spirit.
The Spear in Klingsor's hands therefore,
came to symbolise the Spear in Lucifer's hands. The symbol of the Power
of God, which Lucifer received is therefore, the Holy Spear which he
used symbolically speaking to inflict a wound that would not heal on
the sphere of the Spirit. Parsifal wresting the Spear from Klingsor
and redeeming the brotherhood is therefore, symbolically speaking Parsifal
wresting the Spear from Lucifer and using the Power that lies in it
to heal the sphere of the spirit and as a result redeem the whole world.
With His experiences and the Power
that lies in the Spear, Parsifal would now use the principle of supporting
love to help mankind in His Word. Through the use of this new Grail
principle, the wound inflicted by Lucifer on the spiritual sphere will
close because human beings would no longer be entangled in the material
world but will now be able to find their way back home. The same spear
therefore, that inflicted the wound will be the same that will heal
it as indicated in the legends. The confrontation between Parsifal and
Klingsor represents the face to face battle between Parsifal and Lucifer
with the eventual regain of the Holy Spear.
top
◄◄
-
Abd-ru-shin. In the Light of Truth, the Grail Message. Stiftung
Gralsbotschaft Publishing Company. Stuttgart. 1990.
-
Loomis, Roger Sherman. The Grail, From Celtic Myth to Christian
Symbol. Constable and Company Ltd. 1992.
-
Matthews, John. The Grail, Quest for the eternal. Thames and Hudson
Ltd. 1981.
-
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Multimedia Edition. International Version,
1998.
-
Wagner's Parsifal. Vocal Score, G. Schirmer, Inc. New York.
top
|